Daniel Evans vs Thomas Fabbiano Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W L L L W W L L
Form
W L W L W L L W L LH2H: Evans 3 - 0 Fabbiano
They have played 7 sets in total, with Evans winning 6 and Fabbiano winning 1. The last match between Evans and Fabbiano was at the Nottingham Challenger, 08-06-2022, Second, Grass with Daniel Evans getting the victory 7-5 6-0.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Daniel Evans | 3 |
| Thomas Fabbiano | 0 |
Nottingham Challenger(08-06-2022)
7
5
6
0
| Evans | Stats | Fabbiano |
|---|---|---|
| 33% (5-10) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 3 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 197 | Ranking | Ret. |
| 21 | Highest Rank | 70 |
| 34 | Age | 35 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 24 | Titles | 18 |
| 59% (572-396) | Career Total W/L | 55% (521-428) |
| $4,992,575 | Career Prize Money | $1,279,588 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 2 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Fonseca VS Paul PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
26 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Kartal VS Svitolina PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 6-0 |
Stats 
Daniel Evans
Player
Thomas Fabbiano
64%
(
41 of
64)
1st Serve %
57%
(
31 of
54)
8
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
21 of
31)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
33%
(
21 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
25 of
54)
68
Total Points Won
50
|
||||
| 6-3 3-6 6-3 |
Stats
Daniel Evans
Player
Thomas Fabbiano
58%
(
56 of
97)
1st Serve %
59%
(
44 of
74)
6
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
1
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
56%
(
23 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
20 of
30)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
39%
(
38 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
26 of
74)
85
Total Points Won
86
|
||||
| 6-4 7-5 |
Stats
Daniel Evans
Player
Thomas Fabbiano
60%
(
45 of
75)
1st Serve %
69%
(
50 of
72)
4
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
58%
(
26 of
45)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
45%
(
34 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
72)
74
Total Points Won
73
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 6 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 41 | Games Won | 26 |
| 18 | Aces (Total) | 9 |
| 10 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 1:41:31 | Average Match Time | 1:41:31 |
| 60% (142/236) | 1st Serve % | 63% (125/200) |
| 65% (92/142) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (76/125) |
| 54% (51/94) | 2nd Serve Win % | 53% (40/75) |
| 57% (12/21) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 24% (5/21) |
| 42% (84/200) | Return Points Win % | 39% (93/236) |
| 100% (3/3) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/3) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (3/3) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (3/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (3/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Daniel Evans Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Federico Coria
Player
Daniel Evans
64%
(
50 of
78)
1st Serve %
52%
(
46 of
88)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
39%
(
11 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
18 of
42)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
42%
(
33 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
45 of
88)
90
Total Points Won
76
|
4-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Vitaliy Sachko
Player
Daniel Evans
63%
(
46 of
73)
1st Serve %
60%
(
58 of
97)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
38 of
58)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
33%
(
24 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
42 of
97)
91
Total Points Won
79
|
6-4 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel Evans
Player
Jacopo Berrettini
53%
(
25 of
47)
1st Serve %
55%
(
34 of
62)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
72%
(
18 of
25)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
14 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
62)
63
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Evans
Player
Jelle Sels
65%
(
54 of
83)
1st Serve %
58%
(
56 of
97)
2
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
5
67%
(
36 of
54)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
38 of
56)
62%
(
18 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
35%
(
29 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
39 of
97)
93
Total Points Won
87
|
6-3 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Andrea Pellegrino
Player
Daniel Evans
63%
(
50 of
79)
1st Serve %
61%
(
60 of
99)
0
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
6
60%
(
30 of
50)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
36 of
60)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
16 of
39)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
44%
(
35 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
47 of
99)
91
Total Points Won
87
|
6-3 1-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Karen Khachanov
Player
Daniel Evans
55%
(
27 of
49)
1st Serve %
56%
(
28 of
50)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
19 of
28)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
4 of
22)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
62
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel Rincon
Player
Daniel Evans
61%
(
60 of
98)
1st Serve %
56%
(
44 of
78)
7
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
1
73%
(
44 of
60)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
32 of
44)
37%
(
14 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
41%
(
40 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
27 of
78)
85
Total Points Won
91
|
7-6(7) 7-6(9) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Evans
Player
Stuart Parker
61%
(
44 of
72)
1st Serve %
53%
(
38 of
72)
5
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
28 of
38)
68%
(
19 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
17%
(
1 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
31%
(
22 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
27 of
72)
77
Total Points Won
67
|
6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Brandon Holt
Player
Daniel Evans
69%
(
83 of
120)
1st Serve %
60%
(
63 of
105)
9
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
2
65%
(
54 of
83)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
41 of
63)
49%
(
18 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
20 of
42)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
40%
(
48 of
120)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
44 of
105)
116
Total Points Won
109
|
4-6 7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Evans
Player
Benoit Paire
64%
(
67 of
104)
1st Serve %
48%
(
45 of
93)
6
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
9
73%
(
49 of
67)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
33 of
45)
54%
(
20 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
23 of
48)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
34%
(
35 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
37 of
93)
106
Total Points Won
91
|
6-4 6-7(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Thomas Fabbiano Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Ugo Blanchet
Player
Thomas Fabbiano
47%
(
46 of
97)
1st Serve %
65%
(
51 of
78)
12
Aces
3
7
Double Faults
6
85%
(
39 of
46)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
36 of
51)
51%
(
26 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
33%
(
32 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
29 of
78)
94
Total Points Won
81
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Rudolf Molleker
Player
Thomas Fabbiano
65%
(
37 of
57)
1st Serve %
64%
(
42 of
66)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
21 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
66)
68
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Thomas Fabbiano
Player
Michael Agwi
70%
(
40 of
57)
1st Serve %
55%
(
40 of
73)
0
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
2
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
19 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
73)
72
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Arthur Fery
Player
Thomas Fabbiano
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve %
62%
(
28 of
45)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
19 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
58
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sam Querrey
Player
Thomas Fabbiano
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve %
65%
(
30 of
46)
18
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
11 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
21 of
46)
56
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Thomas Fabbiano
Player
Alastair Gray
57%
(
70 of
123)
1st Serve %
56%
(
59 of
105)
2
Aces
17
5
Double Faults
6
69%
(
48 of
70)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
48 of
59)
53%
(
28 of
53)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
38%
(
47 of
123)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
34 of
105)
110
Total Points Won
118
|
7-6(1) 2-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel Evans
Player
Thomas Fabbiano
64%
(
41 of
64)
1st Serve %
57%
(
31 of
54)
8
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
21 of
31)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
33%
(
21 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
25 of
54)
68
Total Points Won
50
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Thomas Fabbiano
Player
Duje Ajdukovic
70%
(
71 of
101)
1st Serve %
54%
(
56 of
103)
8
Aces
14
5
Double Faults
6
79%
(
56 of
71)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
42 of
56)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
29 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
33 of
103)
105
Total Points Won
99
|
4-6 7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Matteo Gigante
Player
Thomas Fabbiano
58%
(
49 of
84)
1st Serve %
64%
(
39 of
61)
7
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
46%
(
16 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
68%
(
15 of
22)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
40%
(
34 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
24 of
61)
74
Total Points Won
71
|
7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Thomas Fabbiano
Player
Kimmer Coppejans
76%
(
65 of
86)
1st Serve %
63%
(
58 of
92)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
0
66%
(
43 of
65)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
29 of
58)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
37%
(
32 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
42 of
92)
96
Total Points Won
82
|
4-6 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 59% (572/396) | Win/Loss | 55% (521/428) |
| 57% (1358/1025) | Sets Win/Loss | 53% (1207/1058) |
| 52% (12006/10948) | Games Win/Loss | 51% (10971/10369) |
| 61% (248/157) | Hard Win/Loss | 62% (219/136) |
| 46% (50/59) | Clay Win/Loss | 52% (220/202) |
| 62% (181/113) | Indoor Hard W/L | 44% (51/65) |
| 58% (93/67) | Grass Win/Loss | 55% (31/25) |
| 0.24 | Aces Per Game | 0.12 |
| 2705 | Aces Total | 1275 |
| 0.17 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.17 |
| 1917 | Total Double Faults | 1816 |
| 1:7:5 | Average Match Time | 1:2:57 |
| 482.01 | Average Opponent Rank | 574.02 |
| 61% (29251/47891) | 1st Serve % | 64% (29337/45970) |
| 71% (20758/29251) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (19219/29337) |
| 51% (9469/18639) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (8451/16630) |
| 41% (1802/4411) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 41% (1959/4733) |
| 38% (18340/48014) | Return Points Win % | 40% (18409/45934) |
| 52% (46/42) | Slam W/L | 49% (36/37) |
| 42% (33/46) | Masters W/L | 36% (15/27) |
| 43% (20/26) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 52% (105/98) | Main Tour W/L | 44% (68/85) |
| 62% (162/99) | Challenger W/L | 53% (249/219) |
| 71% (205/84) | Futures W/L | 72% (153/59) |
| 61% (529/874) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 55% (499/910) |
| 46% (39/84) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 48% (15/31) |
| 53% (188/353) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 48% (140/293) |
| 54% (177/330) | Deciding Set Win % | 53% (175/331) |
| 84% (566/478) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 83% (497/414) |
| 15% (566/85) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 17% (497/83) |
| 24% (401/95) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 23% (452/106) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
